Record Details

Conservatism As An Ideology

Almanac “Essays on Conservatism”

View Archive Info
 
 
Field Value
 
Title Conservatism As An Ideology
Консерватизм как идеология
 
Creator Samuel Huntington
Сэмюэль Хантингтон
 
Subject

 
Description .
.
 
Publisher “Media almanac “Tetradi po konservatizmu” (“Essays on Conservatism”)
 
Contributor

 
Date 2016-03-01
 
Type info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion


 
Format application/pdf
 
Identifier http://www.essaysonconservatism.ru/jour/article/view/194
10.24030/2409-2517-2016-1-231-250
 
Source Almanac “Essays on Conservatism”; Том 3, № 1 (2016); 231-250
Тетради по консерватизму; Том 3, № 1 (2016); 231-250
2542-1301
2409-2517
10.24030/2409-2517-2016-1
 
Language rus
 
Relation http://www.essaysonconservatism.ru/jour/article/view/194/195
Karl Mannheim, “Ideology and Utopia” (New York, 1949), p. 49
Carl J. Friedrich and Zbigniew K. Brzezinski, “Totalitarian Dictatorship and Autocracy” (Cambridge, 1956), p. 71
Karl Mannheim, “Conservative Thought”, Essays on Sociology and Social Psychology, ed. Paul Kecskemeti (New York, 1953), p. 98-99.
Arthur M. Schlesinger, Jr., “The New Conservatism in America: A Liberal Comment”, Confluence, vol. 2, p. 61-71 (December 1953) и “The New Conservatism: Politics of Nostalgia”, Reporter, vol. 12, p. 9-12 (June 16, 1955)
Bernard Crick, “The Strange Quest for an American Conservatism”, Review of Politics, vol. 17, p. 361-363 (July 1955)
Gordon K. Lewis, “The Metaphysics of Conservatism”, Western Political Quarterly, vol. 6, p. 731-732 (December 1953).
Russell Kirk, “A Program for Conservatives” (Chicago, 1954), p. 22, 38-39
Peter Viereck, “Conservatism Revisited” (New York, 1949), p. 9.
Clinton Rossiter, “Conservatism in America” (New York, 1955), p. 9
Francis G. Wilson, “A Theory of Conservatism”, this Review, vol. 35, p. 39-40 (February 1941)
Raymond English, “Conservatism: The Forbidden Faith”, American Scholar, vol. 21, p. 399401 (October 1952)
Arthur M. Schlesinger, Jr., “Conservative vs. Liberal - A Debate”, New York Times Magazine, March 4, 1956, p. 11
Alfred Cobban, “Edmund Burke and the Revolt against the Eighteenth Century” (London, 1929), p. 40 ff., 75,
Leo Strauss, “Natural Right and History” (Chicago, 1953), p. 13-14, 318-319
Carl J. Friedrich (ed.), “Totalitarianism” (Cambridge, 1954)
Hannah Arendt, “Ideology and Terror: A Novel Form of Government”, Review of Politics, vol. 15, p. 303-327 (July 1953)
Franz Neumann, “Behemoth: The Structure and Practice of National Socialism” (New York, 1942)
Zbigniew K. Brzezinski, “Totalitarianism and Rationality”, this Review, vol. 50, p. 751 (September 1956).
“Pensées sur Divers Sujets”, Oeuvres (Paris, 1817), vol. 6, p. 172.
Joseph de Maistre, “Considerations sur la France”, Oeuvres (Bruxelles, 1838), vol. 7, oh. 1, 2
“Reflections on the Revolution in France”, Works (Boston, 1865), vol. 3, p. 352.
“Thoughts on the Cause of the Present Discontents”, Works, vol. 1, p. 436, 440-441, 469, 472-474, 491-493, 508.
L.B. Namier, “England in the Age of the American Revolution” (London, 1930), p. 15, 38, 40
W.E.H. Lecky, “A History of England in the Eighteenth Century” (New York, 1878), vol. 1, p. 433
J.L. and Barbara Hammond, “The Rise of Modern Industry” (New York, 1926), p. 64-65
W. Cunningham, “The Industrial Revolution” (Cambridge, 1908), p. 494
W.T. Selley, “England in the Eighteenth Century” (London, 1934), p. 218-219
Witt Bowden, “The Rise of the Great Manufacturers in England”, 1760-1790 (Allentown, 1919),
Cavendish Debates, vol. 1, p. 476, цит. по Robert H. Murray, “Edmund Burke: A Biography” (Oxford, 1931), p. 192
Annual Register, 1776, vol. 19, p. 241
Robert Bisset, “The Life of Edmund Burke”, 2 vols. 2d ed. (London, 1800), vol. 2, p. 429.
Morley Burke, p. 190-191, 245, and George H. Sabine, “A History of Political Theory” (New York, 1950, rev. ed), p. 616.
Cf.J.N. Figgis, “From Gerson to Grotius” (Cambridge, 1916), p. 174-179
Charles Nevinson (ed.), “Latter Writings of Bishop Hooper” (Cambridge, 1852), esp. “Annotations on Romans XIII”, p. 93-116
Pierre Janelle (ed.), “Obedience in Church and State: Three Political Tracts by Stephen Gardiner” (Cambridge, 1930)
Henry Walter (ed.), “Doctrinal Treatises by William Tyndale” (Cambridge, 1848), esp. p. 173 ff., 195-197, 240 if.
Christopher Morris, “Political Thought in England, Tyndale to Hooker” (London, 1953), p. 15, 17, 57, 68-77.
John Bramhall, “Works” (Oxford, 1844), vol. 3, “A Fair Warning to take Heed of the Scotch Discipline”, and “The Serpent-Salve, or, the Observator's Grounds Discussed”, esp. p. 236, 241, 272, 298, 309, 318
John Bowle, “Hobbes and His Critics” (New York, 1952), p. 114 ff.
T.S. Eliot, “For Lancelot Andrewes” (Garden City, 1929), p. 27-46.
C.J. Sisson, “The Judicious Marriage of Mr. Hooker and the Birth of the Laws of Ecclesiastical Polity” (Cambridge, 1940)
E.T. Davies, “The Political Ideas of Richard Hooker” (London, 1946), eh. 1, 2.
Reinhold Aris, “History of Political Thought in Germany” (London, 1936), p. 5458, 256
Joseph C. Murray, “The Political Thought of Joseph de Maistre”, Review of Politics, vol. 11, p. 86 (January, 1949)
Charles A. Micaud, “The French Right and Nazi Germany, 19331939” (Durham, 1943), p. 1-15.
William E. Dodd, “The Cotton Kingdom” (New Haven, 1921), p. 48 ff.
Arthur Y. Lloyd, “The Slavery Controversy” (Chapel Hill, 1939), p. 119 ff.
Louis Hartz, “The Liberal Tradition in America” (New York, 1955), p. 146
FJ.C. Hearnshaw, “Conservatism in England” (London, 1933), p. 22 ff.
Kirk, Conservative Mind, p. 7-8; Rossiter, “Conservatism in America”, p. 61-62
Mannheim, “Conservative Thought”, p. 114; Lord Hugh Cecil, “Conservatism” (London, 1937), p. 48
William O. Shanahan, “The Social Outlook of Prussian Conservatism”, Review of Politics, vol. 15, p. 222-225 (April 1953)
R.J. White (ed.), “The Conservative Tradition” (London, 1950), p. 1-10.
Murray, “Review of Politics”, vol. 11, p. 86
Arnaud B. Leavelle and Thomas I. Cook, “George Fitzhugh and the Theory of American Conservatism”, Journal of Politics, vol. 7, p. 146147 (May 1945).
Генри С. Кэриэл “The Limits of Social Science: Henry Adams’ Quest for Order”, в Review, vol. 50, p. 1074 (December 1956).
“Foreign Policy and the Democratic Process” (Балтимор, 1955), p. 5-7
 
Rights Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Авторы, публикующие в данном журнале, соглашаются со следующим:Авторы сохраняют за собой авторские права на работу и предоставляют журналу право первой публикации работы на условиях лицензии Creative Commons Attribution License, которая позволяет другим распространять данную работу с обязательным сохранением ссылок на авторов оригинальной работы и оригинальную публикацию в этом журнале.Авторы сохраняют право заключать отдельные контрактные договорённости, касающиеся не-эксклюзивного распространения версии работы в опубликованном здесь виде (например, размещение ее в институтском хранилище, публикацию в книге), со ссылкой на ее оригинальную публикацию в этом журнале.Авторы имеют право размещать их работу в сети Интернет (например в институтском хранилище или персональном сайте) до и во время процесса рассмотрения ее данным журналом, так как это может привести к продуктивному обсуждению и большему количеству ссылок на данную работу (См. The Effect of Open Access).