Record Details

RESULTS OF RADICAL CYSTPROSTATVESICULECTOMY IN OLD PATIENTS

Herald Urology

View Archive Info
 
 
Field Value
 
Title RESULTS OF RADICAL CYSTPROSTATVESICULECTOMY IN OLD PATIENTS
РЕЗУЛЬТАТЫ РАДИКАЛЬНОЙ ЦИСТОПРОСТАТОВЕЗИКУЛЭКТОМИИ У ПОЖИЛЫХ ПАЦИЕНТОВ
 
Creator A. Mendzheritsky
P. Fornara
А. Менджерицкий ; Университет Мартина Лютера, Галле-Виттенберг
П. Форнара ; Университет Мартина Лютера, Галле-Виттенберг
 
Subject bladder cancer; age; cystectomy; comorbidity
рак мочевого пузыря; возраст; цистэктомии; коморбидность; смертность
 
Description Abstract. As a result of rising life expectancy the indication for radical cystectomy is registered more and more frequently also in elderly and multimorbid patients. This work is aimed to estimate the importance of cystectomy in patients older than 70 years. The study was designed as a comparative analysis of two patients groups of 70-75 (group I) and over 75 (group II) years old with respect to following parameters: preoperative morbidity (Charlson Comorbidity-index), stat. length of hospital stay, transfusion rate, early and late complications, mortality and postoperative life expectancy. The data revealed that patients over 75 years old, who were higher cardiopulmonary preloaded, had a longer hospital stay and exhibited a higher transfusion rate. The early and late complication rates, assessed with the Clavien-Dindo classification, were identical in both groups. At the same time the internal medicine and major complications (CDC 3-5) dominated in the group of over 75 years old patients. The younger patients lived twice as long as the older patients. While having the same 30 days mortality in both groups, the 90 days mortality was higher in the older group. The 5-year survival was significantly higher in the group I. Thus, the radical cystectomy should be strived in older age expecting acceptable higher complication rates and mortality even in multi-morbid patients after more accurately risk stratification and evaluation of individual biological constellation. 
Резюме. В результате увеличения продолжительности жизни показания к радикальной цистэктомии ставятся все чаще и чаще. Пожилые мультиморбидные пациенты не являются исключением. Целью данной работы является оценка цистэктомии у пациентов старше 70 лет. При помощи сравнительного анализа двух групп пациентов 70-75 лет (I группа) и старше 75 лет (группа II) были оценены следующие параметры: предоперационное заболеваемость (индекс коморбидности Чарлсона), продолжительность пребывания в стационаре, частота переливания крови, ранние и поздние осложнения, смертность и продолжительность жизни после операции. Было установлено, что пациенты старше 75 лет, которые имели более отягащенный кардиопульмональный анамнез находились дольше в стационаре и чаще получале перелевание крови. Ранние и поздние осложнения, которые оценивались при помощи классификации Клавиен-Диндо были одинаковыми в обеих группах. В то же время терапевтические и большие осложнения (Клавиен-Диндо 3-5) доминировали в группе пациентов старше 75 лет. Более молодые пациенты жили вдвое дольше, чем пожилые пациенты. При одинаковой 30 дневной смертности в обеих группах, 90 дневная смертность была выше в старшей возрастной группе. 5-летняя выживаемость была достоверно выше в группе I. Таким образом, к радикальной цистэктомии следует стремиться и в более позднем возрасте, даже у мультиморбидных пациентов после точной стратификации рисков и оценки индивидуального биологического состояния, ожидая при этом более высокие но приемлемые показатели осложнений и смертности. 
 
Publisher SEI of HPE, RSMU Ministry of Health, Russia
 
Contributor

 
Date 2016-09-25
 
Type info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion


 
Format application/pdf
 
Identifier http://www.urovest.ru/jour/article/view/103
 
Source Herald Urology; № 3 (2016); 81-125
Вестник урологии; № 3 (2016); 81-125
2308-6424
 
Language rus
 
Relation http://www.urovest.ru/jour/article/view/103/101
Ferlay J, Steliarova-Foucher E et al. (2013) Cancer incidence and mortality patterns in Europe: estimates for 40 countries in 2012. Eur J Cancer 49(6):1374-403.
Krebs in Deutschland 2009/2010. Eine gemeinsame Veröffentlichung des Robert Koch-Instituts und der Gesellschaft der epidemiologischen Krebsregister in Deutschland e.V. 9 Ausgabe, Robert Koch Institut, Berlin 2013, S. 100-103 [3] .
Hautmann RE, Abol-Enein H, Hafez K et al. (2007) Urinary diversion, WHO Concesus Conference on Bladder Cancer. Urology 69 (Sup1):17-49.
Zebic N, Weinknecht S et al. (2005) Radical cystectomy in patients aged ≥75 years: an update review of patients treated with curative and palliative intent. BJU Int 95:1211-1214. (8)
Figueroa AJ, Stein JP et al. (1998) Radical cystectomy for elderly patients with bladder carcinoma: an updated experience with 404 patients. Cancer 83:141-147.
Leibovitch I, Avigad I et al. (1993) Is it justified to avoid radical cystoprostatectomy in elderly patients with invasive transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder? Cancer 71(10):3098-3101.
Charlson M, Szatrowski TP, Peterson J et al. (1994) Validation of a combined comorbidity index. J Clin Epidemiol 47(11):1245-1251.
Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240(2):205-213.
Yoshimura K, Maekawa S, Ichioka K et al. (2001) Tubeless cutaneous ureterostomy: the Toyoda method revisited. J Urol 165 (3):785-788.
F. Schreiter (Hrsg): Plastisch-rekonstruktive Chirurgie in der Urologie. Georg Thieme Verlag, Stuttgart New York, 1999.
Jocham D. Maligne Tumore der Harnblase. In: Jocham D, Miller K, eds. Praxis der Urologie Band II. 2. Auflage Stuttgart, Deutschland: Georg Thieme Verlag, 2003
Zehnder P, Studer UE, Skinner EC et al (2011) Super extended versus extended pelvic lymph node dissection in patients undergoing radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: a comparative study. J Urol 186:1261–1268.
Leibovitch I, Avigad I et al. (1993) Is it justified to avoid radical cystoprostatectomy in elderly patients with invasive transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder? Cancer 71(10):3098-3101.
Stein JP, Lieskovsky G et al. (2001) Radical cystectomy in the treatment of invasive bladder cancer: long-term results in 1054 patients. J Clin Oncol 19(3):666- 675.
Donat SM, Siegrist T, Cronin A et al. (2010) Radical cystectomy in octogenarians-does morbidity outweigh the potential survival benefits? J Urol 183 (6):2171- 2177.
Megwalu II, Vlahiotis A, Radwan M et al. (2008) Prognostic impact of comorbidity in patients with bladder cancer. Eur Urol 53 (3):581-589.
May M, Fuhrer S, Braun KP et al. (2007) Results from three municipal hospitals regarding radical cystectomy on elderly patients. Int Braz J Urol 33 (6):764-776.
Miller DC, Taub DA, Dunn RL et al. (2003) The impact of co-morbid disease on cancer control and survival following radical cystectomy. J Urol 169(1):105-109.
Koppie TM, Serio AM, Vickers AJ et al. (2008) Age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity score is associated with treatment decisions and clinical outcomes for patients undergoing radical cystectomy for bladder cancer. Cancer 112(11):2384-2392.
Marx GF, Meteo CV, Orkin LR (1973) Computer analysis of postanesthetic death. Anesthesiology 39(1):54-58.
Malavaud B, Vaessen C et al. (2001) Complications for radical cystectomy. Impact of the American Society of Anesthesiologists score. Eur Urol 39(1):79-84.
Hollenbeck BK, Miller DC et al. (2005) Identifying risk factors for potentially avoidable complications following radical cystectomy. J Urol 174:1231-1237. [23] Shabsigh A, Koretes R et al. (2009) Defining early morbidity of radical cystectomy for patients with bladder cancer using a standardized reporting methodology. Eur Urol 55:164-176. [24] Boström PJ, Kössi J et al. (2009) Risk factors for mortality and morbididty related to radical cystectomy. BJU Int 103:191-196.
Elting LS, Pettaway C et al. (2005) Correlation between annual volume of cystectomy, professional staffing and outcome: a state-wide, population-based study. Cancer 104:975-984.
Deliveliotis C, Papatsoris A et al. 2005 Urinary diversion in high-risk elderly patients: modified cutaneous ureterostomy or ileal conduit? Urology 66:299-304.
Chang SS, Alberts G et al. (2001) Radical cystectomy is safe in elderly patients at high risk. J Urol 166(3):938-941.
Rödel C, Grabenbauer GG, Kühn R et al. (2002) Combined-modality treatment and selective organpreservation in invasive bladder cancer: long-term results. J Clin Oncol 20(14):3061-3071.
Nagele U, Anastasiadis AG et al. (2007) The rationale for radical cystectomy as primary therapy for T4 bladder cancer. World J Urol 25(4):401-405.
Thüroff JW, Hampel C et al. (2012) Indications for different types of urinary diversion. Urologe A 51(4):473-476.
Daneshmand S, Bartsch G (2001) Improving selection of appropriate urinary diversion following radical cystectomy for bladder cancer. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 11:941-948.
Thüroff JW, Alken P, Engelmann U et al. (1985) The Mainz pouch (mixed augmentation ileum, zecum) for bladder augmentation and continent urinary diversion. Eur Urol 11:152-60.
Sogni F, Brausi M et al. (2008) Morbidity and quality of life in elderly patients receiving ileal conduit or orthotopic neobladder after radical cystectomy for invasive bladder cancer. Urology 71: 919-923.
Clark PE, Stein JP et al. (2005) Radical cystectomy in the elderly: comparison of clincal outcomes between younger and older patients. Cancer 104(1):36-43.
Degerner S, Brandt AS et al. (2012) Imperative cystectomy in patients at risk ileal conduit or ureterocutaneostomy. Urologe A 51 (9):1220-1227.
Shipley WU, Kaufman DS, Zehr E et al. (2002) Selective bladder preservation by combined modality protocol treatment: long-term outcomes of 190 patients with invasive bladder cancer. Urology 60(1):62-67; discussion 67-68.
Rodriguez AR, Lockhart A, King J et al. (2011) Cutaneous ureterostomytechnique for adults and effects of ureteral stenting: an alternative to the ileal conduit. J Urol 186(5):1939-1943.
Zingg EJ, Bornet B et al. (1980) Urinary diversion in the elderly patient. Eur Urol 6(6):347-351.
De Nunzio C, Cicione A et al. (2011) Extraperitoneal radical cystectomy and ureterocutaneostomy in octogenarians. Int Urol Nephrol 43(3):663-667.
Novotny V, Hackenberg OW et al. (2007) Perioperatve complications of radical cystectomy in a contemporary series. Eur Urol 51:397-402.
Novotny V, Hakenberg OW, Froehner M et al. (2013) Systematic assessment of complications and outcome of radical cystectomy undertaken with curative intent in patients with comorbidity and over 75 years of age. Urol Int. 90(2):195-201.
Soulié M, Straub X et al. (2002) A multicenter study of the morbidity of radical cystectomy in selected elderly patients with bladder cancer. J Urol 167:1325–1328.
Knap M, Lundbeck F et al. (2004) Early and late treatment-related morbidity following radical cystectomy. Scand J Urol Nephrol 38:153–160.
Stroumbakis N, Herr HW, Cookson MS et al. (1997) Radical cystectomy in the octogenarian. J Urol 158:2113–2117.
Rosario DJ, Becker M, Anderson JB et al. (2000) The changing pattern of mortality and morbidity from radical cystectomy. BJU Int 85:427–430.
Tilki D, Zaak D, Trottmann M et al (2010) Radical cystectomy in the elderly patient: a contemporary comparison of perioperative complications in a single institution series. World J Urol 28(4):445–450.
Chang SS, Smith JA Jr et al. (2001) Estimated blood loss and transfusion requirements of radical cystectomy. J.Urol 166: 2151-2154.
Farnham SB, Cookson MS et al. (2004) Benefit of radical cystectomy in the elderly patient with significant comorbidities. Urol Oncol 22:178-181.
Wood DP Jr, Montie JE et al. (1987) Radical cystectomy for carcinoma of the bladder in the elderly patient. J Urol 138 (1):46-48.
Figueroa AJ, Stein JP et al. (1998) Radical cystectomy for elderly patients with bladder carcinoma: an updated experience with 404 patients. Cancer 83:141-147.
Gamé X, Soulie´ M, Seguin P et al. (2001) Radical cystectomy in patients older than 75 years: assessment of morbidity and mortality. Eur Urol 39:525–529.
May M, Fuhrer S, Braun KP et al. (2007) Results from three municipal hospitals regarding radical cystectomy on elderly patients. Int Braz J Urol 33(6):764-773.
Gupta NP, Goel R et al. (2004) Radical cystectomy in septuagenarian patients with bladder cancer. Int Urol Nephrol 36:353-358.
Shabsigh A, Korets R et al. (2009) Defining early morbidity of radical cystectomy for patients with bladder cancer using a standardized reporting methodology. Eur Urol 55(1):164-174.
Roghmann F, Noldus J, von Bodman C et al. (2012) Cystectomy in elderly patients: analysis of complications using the Clavien-Dindo classification. Urologe A 51(10):1386-1392.
Bartsch G, Gust K et al. (2013) Cystectomy in the elderly patient. Urologe A 2(6):821-826.
Novotny V, Zastrow S et al. (2012) Radical cystectomy in patients over 70 years of age: impact of comorbidity on perioperative morbidity and mortality. World J Urol 30(6):769-776.
De Vries RR, Kauer P, van Tinteren H et al. (2012) Short-term outcome after cystectomy: comparison of two different perioperative protocols. Urol Int 88(4):383- 389.
Hautmann RE, de Petriconi R et al. (1999) The ileal neobladder: complications and functional results in 363 patients after 11 years of follow-up. J Urol 161:422-427.
Leissner J, Stein R et al. (1999) Radical cystoprostatectomy combined with Mainz pouch bladder substitution to the urethra: long-term results. BJU Int 83:964- 970.
Yamanaka K, Miyake H et al. (2007) Significance of radical cystectomy for bladder cancer in patients over 80 years old. Int Urol Nephrol 39:209-214.
Mendiola FP, Zorn KC (2007) Cystectomy in the ninth decade: operative results and long-term survival outcomes. Can J Urol 14:3628-3634.
Froehner M, Brausi MA et al. (2009) Complications following radical cystectomy for bladder cancer in the elderly. Eur Urology 56:443-454.
Saika T, Syama B et al. (2001) Orthotopic neobladder reconstruction in elderly bladder cancer patients. Int J Urol 39: 79-84.
Lance RS, Dinney CR et al. (2001) Radical cystectomy for invasive bladder, cancer in the octogenarian. Oncol Rep 8:723-726.
Kouba E, Sands M, Lentz A et al. (2007) A comparison of the Bricker versus Wallace ureteroileal anastomosis in patients undergoing urinary diversion for bladder cancer. J Urol 178:945-948.
Madersbacher S, Schmidt J, Eberle JM et al. (2003) Long-term outcome of ileal conduit diversion. J Urol 169(3):985-990.
Large MC, Cohn JA et al (2013) The impact of running versus interrupted anastomosis on ureterointestinal stricture rate after radical cystectomy. J Urol 193:923-927.
March Villalba JA, Martinez et al (2008) Radical cystectomy as a muscleinvasive bladder cancer treatment in elderly patients. Actas Urol Esp 32:696-704.
Knapp MM, Lundbeck F et al. (2004) Early and late treatment-related morbidity following radical cystectomy. Scand J urol Nephrol 38:153-160.
Gschwend JE, Hautmann RE, Volkmer BG (2004) Radical cystectomy and urinary diversion in elderly patients with comorbid medical conditions. Urologe A 43:930-934.
Gschwend JE (2003) Bladder substitution. Curr Opin Urol 13(6):477-482.
Msezane L, Reynolds WS et al. (2008) Open surgical repair of ureteral strictures and fistulas following radical cystectomy and urinary diversion. J Urol 179(4):1428-1431.
Tal R, Sivan B et al. (2007) Management of benign ureteral strictures following radical cystectomy and urinary diversion for bladder cancer. J Urol 178(2):538-542.
Madersbacher S, Bauer W et al. (2010) Radical cystectomy for bladder cancer in the 70+ population: a nation-wide registry analysis of 845 patients. Urol Int 85(3):287-290.
Liberman D, LughezzanieG, Sun M et al. (2011) Perioperative mortality is significantly greater in septuagenarian and octogenarian patients treated with radical cystectomy for urothelial carcinoma of the bladder. Urology 77:660-666.
May M, Fritsche H-M et al. (2011) Einfluss des Alters auf das karzinomspezifische Überleben nach radikaler Zystektomie. Urologe 50:821-829.
Liguori G, Trombetta C et al. (2007) Major invasive surgery for urologic cancer in octogenarians with comorbid medical conditions. Eur Urol 51:1600-1605.
Dalbagni G, Genega E et al. (2001) Cystectomy for bladder cancer: a contemporary series. J Urol 165:1111-1116.
Takahashi A, Tsukamoto T et al. (2004) Radical cystectomy for invasive bladder cancer: results of multi-istitutional pooled analysis. Jpn J Clin Oncol 34:14-19.
Nielsen ME, Shariat SF et al. (2007) Bladder Cancer Research Consortium (BCRC). Advanced age is associated with poorer bladder cancer-specific survival in patients treated with radical cystectomy. Eur Urol 51(3):699–706.
Lughezzani G, Sun M et al. (2011) A population-based competing-risks analysis of the survival of patients treated with radical cystectomy for bladder cancer. Cancer 117(1):103-109.
Vardi M, Ghanem-Zuobi NO et al. (2012) Sepsis in nonagenarians admitted to Internal Medicine departments: a comparative study of outcomes. QJM 106(3):261-266.
Cohen HJ (1997) Cancer and the functional status of the elderly. Cancer 80(10):1883-1886.
Krege S, Friedrich C et al. (2004) Geriatric assessment. Is it significantly helpful in selection of elderly tumor patients for a difficult therapy? Urologe A 43(8):922–929.
Monfardini S, Balducci L (1999) A comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) is necessary for the study and the management of cancer in the elderly. Eur J Cancer 35(13):1771-1772.
 
Rights Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Авторы, публикующие статьи в данном журнале, соглашаются на следующее:Авторы сохраняют за собой автороские права и предоставляют журналу право первой публикации работы, которая по истечении 6 месяцев после публикации автоматически лицензируется на условиях Creative Commons Attribution License , которая позволяет другим распространять данную работу с обязательным сохранением ссылок на авторов оригинальной работы и оригинальную публикацию в этом журнале.Авторы имеют право размещать их работу в сети Интернет (например в институтском хранилище или персональном сайте) до и во время процесса рассмотрения ее данным журналом, так как это может привести к продуктивному обсуждению и большему количеству ссылок на данную работу (См. The Effect of Open Access).