Record Details

COMPARISON OF LAPAROSCOPIC AND OPEN METHOD OF TREATMENT AT PATHOLOGY OF THE VAGINAL PROCESS OF THE PERITONEUM

Herald Urology

View Archive Info
 
 
Field Value
 
Title COMPARISON OF LAPAROSCOPIC AND OPEN METHOD OF TREATMENT AT PATHOLOGY OF THE VAGINAL PROCESS OF THE PERITONEUM
СРАВНЕНИЕ ЛАПАРОСКОПИЧЕСКОГО И ОТКРЫТОГО МЕТОДОВ ЛЕЧЕНИЯ ПРИ ПАТОЛОГИИ ВЛАГАЛИЩНОГО ОТРОСТКА БРЮШИНЫ
 
Creator M. Kogan I.; Rostov state medical University of the Ministry of health of Russia, Rostov-on-don
V. Sizonov V.; Rostov state medical University of the Ministry of health of Russia, Rostov-on-don;
Regional children's hospital, Rostov-on-don
A. Makarov G.; Regional children's hospital, Rostov-on-don
М. Коган И.; ГБОУ ВПО Ростовский государственный медицинский университет Минздрава России, Ростов-на-Дону
В. Сизонов В.; ГБОУ ВПО Ростовский государственный медицинский университет Минздрава России, Ростов-на-Дону;
ГБУ РО Областная детская клиническая больница, Ростов-на-Дону
А. Макаров Г.; ГБУ РО Областная детская клиническая больница, Ростов-на-Дону
 
Subject hydrocele; testicular atrophy;processus vaginalis; internal inguinal ring; laparoscopy
гидроцеле; атрофия яичка; влагалищный отросток; внутреннее паховое кольцо; лапароскопия
 
Description Abstract. The article contains literature review is devoted to the problem of hydrocele, comparison of different methods of treatment of patients with this pathology, and evaluation of postoperative complications. 
Резюме. Статья содержит литературный обзор, посвященный проблеме гидроцеле, сравнению различных методов лечения пациентов с данной патологией и оценке послеоперационных осложнений. 
 
Publisher SEI of HPE, RSMU Ministry of Health, Russia
 
Contributor —
—
 
Date 2016-09-25
 
Type info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
—
—
 
Format application/pdf
 
Identifier http://www.urovest.ru/jour/article/view/99
 
Source Herald Urology; № 3 (2016); 28-40
Вестник урологии; № 3 (2016); 28-40
2308-6424
 
Language rus
 
Relation http://www.urovest.ru/jour/article/view/99/97
Мирский В.Е., Рищук С.В. Руководство по детской и подростковой андрологии. СПб.,2008, с.4–5.
Адамян А.А., Федоров В.Д., Гогия Б.Ш. Эволюция лечения паховых грыж. Хирургия. 2000, 3. с. 51–53.
Щебеньков М.В. Эндовидеохирургическое лечение детей с патологией влагалищного отростка брюшины и элементов семенного канатика: Автореф. дисс…д_ра мед. наук. – СПб., 2002. – 29
Каган С.А. Стерильность у мужчин Л: Медицина 1974: 223
Geiger, J.D. Selective Laparoscopic Probing for a Contralateral Patent Processus Vaginalis Reduces the Need for Contralateral Exploration in Inconclusive Cases / J.D. Geiger // J. Pediatr. Surg. 2000. - Vol. 35, № 8. -P. 1151- 1154.
Ger R., Monroe K., Duvivier R. Management of indirect inguinal hernia by laparoscopic closure of the neck of the sac // Am. J. Surg. - 1990. - Vol. 159. - P. 370-373.
El-Gohary, M.A. Laparoscopic ligation of inguinal hernia in girls / M.A. ElGohary // PediatrEndosurgInnovTechn. - 1997. – Vol. 1. - P. 185-187.
Janetschek G, Reissigl A, Bartsch G.J Laparoscopic repair of pediatric hydroceles // Endourol. 1994Dec;8(6):415-7.
Arregui ME, Navarrete J, Davis CJ, Castro D, Nagan RF Laparoscopic inguinal herniorrhaphy. Techniques and controversies.//.SurgClin North Am. 1993 Jun;73(3):513-27.
Davies NM, Dunn DC, Appleton B, BevingtonE.Ann R Experience with 300 laparoscopic inguinal hernia repairs with up to 3 years follow-up. CollSurg Engl. 1995 Nov;77(6):409-12.
Pellegrin K, Bensard DD, Karrer FM, Meagher DP Jr.AmLaparoscopic evaluation of contralateral patent processus vaginalis in children. // J Surg. 1996 Nov;172(5):602-5; discussion 606.
Montupet P., Esposito C. Laparoscopic treatment of congenital inguinal hernias in children // J. Pediatr. Surg. - 1999. - Vol. 34. - P. 420-423
Schier F. Laparoscopic herniorrhaphy in girls. J PediatrSurg1998;33:1495–1497
Щебеньков, М.В. Лапароскопическаягерниорафия / М.В. Щебеньков // Эндоскопическая хирургия. - 1995. - №4. - С. 7-9.
Spurbeck W.W., Prasad R., Lobe T.E. Two-year experience with minimally invasive herniorrhaphy in children // SurgEndosc. - 2005. - Vol. 19. - P. 551.,
Shalaby R.Y., Fawy M., Soliman S.M. &Dorgham A. A new simplified technique for needlescopic inguinal herniorrhaphy in children // J. Pediatr. Surg. - 2006. - Vol 41. - P. 863-867.
Chinnaswamy P., Malladi V., Jani K.V. et al. Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair in children // JSLS. - 2005. - Vol. 9. - P. 393-820.
Patkowski D., Czernik J., Chrzan R. et al. Percutaneous internal ring suturing: a simple minimally invasive technique for inguinal hernia repair in children // J. Laparoendosc. Adv. SurgTechn. - 2006. - Vol. 16. - P. 513-517
Козлов, Ю.А. Сравнительный анализ 569 случаев лапароскопической и открытой паховой герниорафии у детей первых трех месяцев жизни / Ю.А. Козлов, В.А. Новожилов, П.А. Краснов // Анналы хирургии. - 2013. - №5. - С. 49-54.
Акрамов, Н.Р. Первый опыт использования лапароскопически ассистированной экстраперитонеальной игниопунктурнойгерниорафии при паховых грыжах у новорожденных / Н.Р. Акрамов, А.А. Подшивалин, Т.И. Омаров // Репродуктивное здоровье детей и подростков. - 2014. - №1. - С. 71-75.
Ozgediz D., Roayaie K., Lee H. et al. Subcutaneous endoscopically assisted ligation (SEAL) of the internal ring for repair of inguinal hernias in children: report of a new technique and early results // Surg. Endosc. - 2007. - Vol. 21. - P. 1327-1331.
Chan KL, Hui WC, Tam PKH. Prospective, randomized, singlecenter, singleblind comparison of laparoscopic vs open repair of pediatric inguinal hernia. SurgEndosc 2005; 19:927–932.
Tsai YC, Wu CC, Yang SSD. Open versus minilaparoscopic herniorrhaphy for children: A prospective comparative trial with midterm follow-up evaluation. Surg Endosc 2010;24:21–24,
Niyogi A, Tahim AS, Sherwood WJ, De Caluwe D, Madden NP, Abel RM, Haddad MJ, Clarke SA. A comparative study examining open inguinal herniotomy with and without hernioscopy to laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair in a pediatric population. PediatrSurgInt 2010;26:387–392.
Koivusalo A, Pakarinen MP, Rintala RJ. Laparoscopic herniorrhaphy after manual reduction of incarcerated inguinal hernia. SurgEndosc 2007;21:2147–2149. 14. Bharathi RS, Arora M, Baskaran V. Pediatric inguinal hernia: Laparoscopic versus open surgery. JSLS 2008;12:277–281.
Esposito C, Montupet P. Laparoscopic treatment of recurrent inguinal hernia in children. PediatrSurgInt 1998;14:182–184.
Shalaby R, Desoky A. Needlescopic inguinal hernia repair in children. Pediatr-SurgInt 2002;1:13–16.
Becmeur F, Philippe P, Schultz AL. A continuous series of 96 laparoscopic inguinal hernia repairs in children by a new technique. SurgEndosc 2004;18:1738–1741.
Kaya M, Huckstedt T, Schier F. Laparoscopic approach to incarcerated inguinal hernia in children. J PediatrSurg 2006;41:567–569.
Shalaby R, Shams AM, Mohamed S, El-Leathy M, Ibrahem M, Alsaed G. Twotrocar needlescopic approach to incarcerated inguinal hernia in children. J PediatrSurg 2007;42: 1259–1262.
Chan KL. Laparoscopic repair of recurrent childhood inguinal hernias after open herniotomy. Hernia 2007;11: 37–40.
Chang YT, Wang JY, Lee JY, Chiou CS, Hsieh JS. Onetrocar laparoscopic transperitoneal closure of inguinal hernia in children. World J Surg 2008;32:2459–2463
SarangaBharathi R. Comparative study of laparoscopic versus conventional surgery for congenital inguinal hernia in children // MS thesis. - India, Pune: University of Pune, 2007.
Perlstein J., Du Bois J.J. The role of laparoscopy in the management of suspected recurrent pediatric hernias // J. Pediatr. Surg. - 2000. - Vol. 35. - P. 1205-1208.
SarangaBharathi R., Arora M., Baskaran V. How we "SEAL" the internal ring in pediatric inguinal hernias // Surg Lap EndoscPercut Tech 2008.,
Takehara H., Yakabe S., Kameoka K. Laparoscopic percutaneous extraperitoneal closure for inguinal hernia in children: clinical outcome of 972 repairs done in 3 pediatric surgical institutions // J. Pediatr. Surg. - 2006. - Vol. 41. - P. 1999-2003
Niyogi A, Tahim AS, Sherwood WJ, De Caluwe D, Madden NP, Abel RM, Haddad MJ, Clarke SA. A comparative study examining open inguinal herniotomy with and without hernioscopy to laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair in a pediatric population. PediatrSurgInt 2010;26:387–392
Shalaby R, Ibrahem R, Shahin M, Yehya A, Abdalrazek M, Alsayaad I, Shouker MA. Laparoscopic hernia repair versus open herniotomy in children: A controlled randomized study. Minim Invasive Surg 2012;2012:484135.,
Yang C, Zhang H, Pu J, Mei H, Zheng L, Tong Q. Laparoscopic vs open herniorrhaphy in the management of pediatric inguinal hernia: A systemic review and metaanalysis. J PediatrSurg2011;46:1824 –1834
Montupet P, Esposito C. Fifteen years’ experience in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair in pediatric patients. Resultsandconsiderationson a debatedprocedure. SurgEndosc2011;25:450–453.
Wantz, G.E. Complications of inguinal hernia repair. SurgClinNorthAm. 1984; 64: 287–289
Matsuda, T., Horii, Y., and Yoshida, O. Unilateral obstruction of the vas deferens caused by childhood inguinal herniorrhaphy in male infertility patients. FertilSteril. 1992; 58: 609–613
Tekatli, H., Schouten, N., van Dalen, T., Burgmans, I., and Smakman, N. Mechanism, assessment, and incidence of male infertility after inguinal hernia surgery: a review of the preclinical and clinical literature. Am J Surg. 2012; 204: 503–509
Pinggera, G.M., Mitterberger, M., Bartsch, G., Strasser, H., Gradl, J., Aigner, F. et al. Assessment of the intratesticular resistive index by colour Doppler ultrasonography measurements as a predictor of spermatogenesis. BJU Int. 2008; 101: 722–726.
Canqiang Li, Le Xu, Yonghui Peng.et al. Effects of single-port laparoscopic percutaneous extraperitoneal closure on the orientation of the vas deferens and testicular perfusion and volume: Experience from a single center. Journal of Pediatric UrologyPublished online: December 16 2015
Parelkar SV, Oak S, Gupta R, Sanghvi B, Shimoga PH, Kaltari D, Prakash A, Shekhar R, Gupta A, Bachani M. Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair in the pediatric age group—Experience with 437 children. J PediatrSurg 2010; 45:789–792
Saha N, Biswas I, Rahman MA, Islam MK. Surgical outcome of laparoscopic and open surgery of pediatric inguinal hernia. Mymensingh Med J 2013;22:232 –236.)
Esposito C, Giurin I, Alicchio F, Farina A, Iaquinto M, Scermino S, Palladino T, Settimi A. Unilateral inguinal hernia: Laparoscopic or inguinal approach. Decision making strategy: A prospective study. Eur J Pediatr 2012;171:989–991
Yerkes EB, Brock JW 3rd, Holcomb GW 3rd, Morgan WM 3rd. ИДР . Laparoscopic evaluation for a contralateral patent processus vaginalis: Part III. Urology 1998;51:480 –483.
Holcomb GW 3rd, Morgan WM 3rd, Brock JW 3rd. Laparoscopic evaluation for contralateral patent processus vaginalis: Part II. JPediatrSurg 1996;31:1170 –1173
Miltenburg DM, Nuchtern JG, Jaksic T, Kozinetiz C, Brandt ML. Laparoscopic evaluation of the pediatric inguinal hernia A metaanalysis. J PediatrSurg 1998;3: 874–879.
Yang C, Zhang H, Pu J, Mei H, Zheng L, Tong Q. Laparoscopic vs open herniorrhaphy in the management of pediatric inguinal hernia: A systemic review and metaanalysis. J PediatrSurg2011;46:1824 –1834.
Alzahem A. Laparoscopic versus open inguinal herniotomy in infants and children: A meta -analysis. PediatrSurgInt2011;27:605 –612)
Акрамов Н.Р. Омаров Т. Совершенствование хирургического лечения врожденных паховых грыж у мальчиков. Автореф. дисс…к_та мед. наук. – Казань., 2016. – 60-64.
 
Rights Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Авторы, публикующие статьи в данном журнале, соглашаются на следующее:Авторы сохраняют за собой автороские права и предоставляют журналу право первой публикации работы, которая по истечении 6 месяцев после публикации автоматически лицензируется на условиях Creative Commons Attribution License , которая позволяет другим распространять данную работу с обязательным сохранением ссылок на авторов оригинальной работы и оригинальную публикацию в этом журнале.Авторы имеют право размещать их работу в сети Интернет (например в институтском хранилище или персональном сайте) до и во время процесса рассмотрения ее данным журналом, так как это может привести к продуктивному обсуждению и большему количеству ссылок на данную работу (См. The Effect of Open Access).